Drawing for JÄGER RACING

USPTO serial 77092571

JÄGER RACING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PEREZ, STEVEN M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JÄGER RACING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Katrin Lewertoff and Leslie K. Mitchell

Katrin Lewertoff and Leslie K. Mitchell Arent Fox LLP1675 BroadwayNew York, NY 10019UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Cardboard, photographs, stationery, printers' type and printing blocks, art paper, bond paper, copy paper, envelope paper, drawing paper, photocopy paper and printing paper, cardboard boxes, cardboard cartons and cardboard containers, printed materials, namely, press releases featuring commercial and cultural activities in the promotion of alcoholic beverages, plastic bags for packagingACTIVE—
024Textile fabrics for the manufacture of clothing, hand towels of textile, felt and non-woven textile fabrics, face towels of textile materialsACTIVE—
025Clothing, namely, shirts, shorts, pants, jackets, suits, underwear, socks, pajamas, lingerie, sweat shirts and sweat pants, footwear, headgear, namely hats and capsACTIVE—
033Liqueurs, namely herbal liqueurs, distilled spiritsACTIVE—
041Entertainment in the nature of automobile racesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 28, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 28, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 9, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 9, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 9, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 28, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 28, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 28, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 8, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 8, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 8, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 27, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 19, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 4, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 15, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 27, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 25, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 19, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 19, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 19, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 19, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 19, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 3, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 3, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 3, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 22, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 2, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 31, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 30, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 30, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 21, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 21, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 14, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 30, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance