USPTO serial 77092880
KARMONY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WELLS, KELLEY L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KARMONY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Mountain View, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas H. Zellerbach & Stacy E. Don
Thomas H. Zellerbach & Stacy E. Don Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPIP Prosecution Department4 Park Plaza, Suite 1600Irvine, CA 92614-2558Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in comparing and providing product ratings of a wide variety of consumer products and consumer services of others; computer software for recommending the consumer products and consumer services of others based upon user defined preferences and characteristics; computer software for on-line order fulfillment; computer software for use in facilitating e-commerce in the fields of the consumer products and consumer services of others; computer software for use in e-commerce to allow users to perform electronic business transactions via a global computer network; computer software for use in promoting the goods and services of others in advertising; computer search engine software; computer software for streaming information and data, namely, audio, video, graphics and text, via the Internet and via mobile and wireless communication devices; consumer electronics, namely, global positioning systems, computer navigation software for use in automobiles and in hand-held devices; computer software for providing commercial information and advice for consumers in the fields of consumer products, retail services, entertainment, movies, music, travel, hotels, electronic devices, computer software, retail and wholesale stores, online stores, shopping malls, restaurants, clothing, personal care products, health and beauty products, appliances, books, financial services, real estate agents, legal services, educational services, plumbers, general contractors, pediatricians, doctors, cosmeticians, dentists, car mechanics, mortgage brokers, insurance companies, news channels, news publications, wines, diets, recipes, and spas; computer software for providing information about and making referrals in the field of consumer products and services for retail services concerning products, services, events, activities, attractions and facilities in particular geographic locations; computer software for providing consumer information and recommendations in a wide variety of fields, namely, entertainment, movies, music, travel, hotels, electronic devices, computer software, retail and wholesale stores, online stores, shopping malls, restaurants, clothing, personal care products, health and beauty products, appliances, books, financial services, real estate agents, legal services, educational services, plumbers, general contractors, pediatricians, doctors, cosmeticians, dentists, car mechanics, mortgage brokers, insurance companies, news channels, news publications, wines, diets, recipes, and spas | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 17, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 3, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 6, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 2, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 18, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |