USPTO serial 77093481
D-FUSION+
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LORENZO, KATHLEEN H
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with D-FUSION+?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph T. Jasper
JOSEPH T. JASPER HANLEY FLIGHT & ZIMMERMAN, LLC150 S WACKER DRIVESUITE 2100CHICAGO, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Conditioners; Exfoliants for hair; Gel for hair; Hair balsam; Hair bleach; Hair bleaches; Hair bleaching preparations; Hair care creams; Hair care kits comprising non-medicated hair care preparations, namely, odor eliminating products, hair mists, sprays, deodorizing solutions and deionizing solutions; Hair care lotions; Hair care preparations; Hair cleaning preparations; Hair color; Hair color removers; Hair colorants; Hair coloring preparations; Hair conditioner; Hair conditioners; Hair creams; Hair decolorants; Hair dye; Hair dyes; Hair emollients; Hair fixers; Hair frosts; Hair gel; Hair gels; Hair lacquers; Hair lighteners; Hair lotions; Hair mascara; Hair mousse; Hair mousses; Hair nourishers; Hair oils; Hair pomades; Hair relaxers; Hair relaxing preparations; Hair rinses; Hair rinses; Hair shampoo; Hair spray; Hair straightening preparations; Hair styling gel; Hair styling preparations; Hair styling spray; Hair tonic; Hair tonics; Hair waving lotion; Hair-washing powder; Mousse for hair; Oils for hair conditioning; Pomades for hair; Shampoos | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 30, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 11, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 11, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 24, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |