USPTO serial 77093485
A BREEZE FOR HAIR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LORENZO, KATHLEEN H
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with A BREEZE FOR HAIR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph T. Jasper
JOSEPH T. JASPER HANLEY FLIGHT & ZIMMERMAN, LLC150 S WACKER DR STE 2100CHICAGO, IL 60606-4202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Conditioners; Exfoliants for hair; Gel for hair; Hair balsam; Hair bleach; Hair bleaches; Hair bleaching preparations; Hair care creams; Hair care kits comprising non-medicated hair care preparations, namely, odor eliminating products, hair mists, sprays, deodorizing solutions and deionizing solutions; Hair care lotions; Hair care preparations; Hair cleaning preparations; Hair color; Hair color removers; Hair colorants; Hair coloring preparations; Hair conditioner; Hair conditioners; Hair creams; Hair decolorants; Hair dye; Hair dyes; Hair emollients; Hair fixers; Hair frosts; Hair gel; Hair gels; Hair lacquers; Hair lighteners; Hair lotions; Hair mascara; Hair mousse; Hair mousses; Hair nourishers; Hair oils; Hair pomades; Hair relaxers; Hair relaxing preparations; Hair rinses; Hair rinses; Hair shampoo; Hair spray; Hair straightening preparations; Hair styling gel; Hair styling preparations; Hair styling spray; Hair tonic; Hair tonics; Hair waving lotion; Hair-washing powder; Mousse for hair; Oils for hair conditioning; Pomades for hair; Shampoos | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 8, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 8, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 6, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 12, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 23, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 24, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |