USPTO serial 77094415
SCOTT & ZELDA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WHITE, RICHARD F
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SCOTT & ZELDA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Fragrances for personal use | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Belts; Blouses; Boots; Capes; Caps; Coats; Dresses; Gloves; Golf shirts; Gowns; Hats; Jackets; Lingerie; Pants; Petticoats; Polo shirts; Raincoats; Scarves; Shoes; Shorts; Skirts; Socks; T-shirts; Tuxedos; Underwear; Vests | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2010 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 5, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 21, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 19, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 20, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 18, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 18, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 4, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 22, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 12, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 12, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 4, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 11, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 22, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 23, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 3, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |