USPTO serial 77094797
BE TRENDY BE DIVA BY IU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3649223Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 7, 2009
- Examiner
- LAVACHE, ROBERT JAMES
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BE TRENDY BE DIVA BY IU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael A. Grow
IU Cosmetics S.A. de C.V.Blvd. Juan Alonso de Torres No. 106Leon GTO, 37204MEXICOGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by IU Cosmetics S.A. de C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by IU Cosmetics S.A. de C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by IU Cosmetics S.A. de C.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named BE TRENDY BE DIVA BY IU
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 8, 2015 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Aug 8, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 8, 2015 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 1, 2009 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 11, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 12, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 8, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 25, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 19, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |