USPTO serial 77095766
MAGIC MIRROR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUTLER, MIDGE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MAGIC MIRROR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Surrey GU7 1LQ, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John A. Clifford
JOHN A. CLIFFORD MERCHANT & GOULD P.C.PO BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer programs for data storage, retrieval and display on interactive RFID (Radio Frequency Identification) mirror display screens, flat panel display screens or plasma display screens;wireless antenna integrated into display screens for registering electronic product code from transponders on tagged items for wireless transmittal to a computer operating system to allow for the display of informational data on the mirrored surface; flat panel display screens; plasma display screens | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Mirrors; mirror frames | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 26, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 31, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 26, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 11, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |