USPTO serial 77096357
IFOOD STUDIOS NYC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KHOURI, SANI PHILIPPE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IFOOD STUDIOS NYC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising services, namely, promoting the food and wine of others; Charitable services, namely, coordination of the procurement and distribution of food donations from manufacturers, wholesalers, retailers and government agencies to organizations providing free food to needy people; Franchising, namely, consultation and assistance in business management, organization and promotion; Professional business consultation | ABANDONED | Apr 18, 2006 |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, wine and food tastings; Entertainment, namely, a continuing food and beverage show broadcast over television, satellite, audio and video media; Mobile media and entertainment services in the nature of content preparation; Mobile media and entertainment services in the nature of content preparation, post-production; Providing voice overs for tapes, records and other recorded media | ABANDONED | Apr 18, 2006 |
| 043 | Catering for the provision of food and beverages; Catering in fast-food cafeterias; Catering of food and drinks; Charitable services, namely, providing food to needy persons; Consulting services in the field of culinary arts; Consulting services in the field of hospitality; Contract food services; Food preparation services; Health resort services, namely, providing food and lodging that specialize in promoting patrons' general health and well-being; Preparation of food and beverages; Providing of food and drink for patients and guests; Serving food and drinks; Serving of food and drink/beverages; Sommelier services, namely, providing advice on wine and wine and food pairing | ABANDONED | Apr 18, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 8, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 6, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 6, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 6, 2008 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 12, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 24, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |