Drawing for LDISCOVERYCONSULTING

USPTO serial 77098112

LDISCOVERYCONSULTING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHISOLM, KEVON
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LDISCOVERYCONSULTING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rex A. Donnelly

REX A. DONNELLY RATNERPRESTIAPO BOX 1596WILMINGTON, DE 19899-1596UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business consulting and auditing in the field of information technology systems and computer forensic investigations; Business enquiries and investigations; Business expert evaluations and preparing business reports relating to computer forensic investigations, electronic discovery, and file retentionACTIVE—
042Conducting computer forensic investigations; Providing electronic discovery services; Technical expert evaluations and reports relating to computer forensic investigations, electronic discovery, and file retention; Computer services, namely acting as an application service provider in the field of electronic discovery to provide, host, manage, develop, and maintain electronic databases for storage and sharing of data and informationACTIVE—
045Background investigation and research services; Litigation support services and legal consultation servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 13, 2016ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 9, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 9, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 8, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 16, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 26, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 11, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 10, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 6, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 6, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 6, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 31, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 2, 2007PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jun 20, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 20, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 22, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 22, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 8, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Feb 7, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance