USPTO serial 77098464
NEGAWATT NETWORK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TWOHIG, SHANNON MARIE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NEGAWATT NETWORK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William J. Morris III
William J. Morris III BROMBERG & SUNSTEIN LLP125 SUMMER STBOSTON, MA 02110-1618UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Consulting services in the fields of energy management, measurement, and consumption for demand response; energy auditing services for demand response; energy price comparison services for demand response; energy usage management services for demand response; energy usage management information services for demand response | ACTIVE | Aug 31, 2006 |
| 036 | Energy brokerage services | ACTIVE | Aug 31, 2006 |
| 039 | Distribution of energy | ACTIVE | Aug 31, 2006 |
| 042 | Energy usage monitoring, metering, and analysis for demand response; remote monitoring and controlling of energy use and generation for commercial, industrial, and residential sites for demand response | ACTIVE | Aug 31, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 2008 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 29, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 1, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 1, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |