Drawing for PROSOFT

USPTO serial 77099259

PROSOFT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DAWE III, WILLIAM H
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with PROSOFT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ronald E. Hunter

Ronald E. Hunter Cargill, IncorporatedLaw Department - MS 24 P.O. Box 5624Minneapolis, MN 55440UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029protein for use as a food ingredientABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 10, 2008MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Oct 10, 2008ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Oct 10, 2008OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Oct 10, 2008OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jun 18, 2008OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Feb 19, 2008ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 30, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 11, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 10, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 27, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 15, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 15, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 15, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 6, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 6, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 15, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 15, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 15, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 9, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Feb 8, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance