Drawing for FRESH SQUEEZED

USPTO serial 77100217

FRESH SQUEEZED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MURRAY, DAVID T
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FRESH SQUEEZED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gillian Lusins

30 ROCKEFELLER CENTERLAW DEPARTMENTNEW YORK, NY 10112

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Television programming services; entertainment services, namely, providing a one-hour daily news and entertainment television programACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 21, 2008UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Nov 10, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 10, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 17, 2008UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Apr 8, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 15, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 8, 2008UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Dec 26, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 13, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 4, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 4, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 4, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 4, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 4, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 28, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 26, 2007PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Nov 14, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 14, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 11, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 10, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 10, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 10, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 25, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 25, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 25, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 9, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance