USPTO serial 77100273
SEACOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AIKENS, RONALD E
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SEACOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Beauty creams for body care; Body and beauty care cosmetics; Conditioners; Cosmetic creams for skin care; Cosmetic preparations for body care; Cosmetic preparations for skin renewal; Exfoliants for skin; Lotions for face and body care; Non-medicated skin care preparations; Non-medicated skin creams; Non-medicated stimulating lotions for the skin; Non-medicated sun care preparations; Shampoos; Skin care products, namely, non-medicated skin serum; Skin clarifiers; Skin cleansers; Skin cleansing cream; Skin cleansing lotion; Skin conditioners; Skin cream; Skin creams; Skin creams in liquid and solid form; Skin emollients; Skin lighteners; Skin lotion; Skin lotions; Skin masks; Skin moisturizer; Skin moisturizer masks; Skin polishing rice bran, also known as arai-nuka; Skin soap; Skin toners; Skin whitening creams; Soaps for body care; Sun care lotions; Topical skin sprays for cosmetic purposes; Wrinkle removing skin care preparations | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 23, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 23, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 23, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 9, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 23, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 25, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |