USPTO serial 77101114
HAMPTON BAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LE, KHANH M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HAMPTON BAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Benjamin Charkow
Benjamin Charkow Amster, Rothstein & Ebenstein LLP90 Park Avenue21st FloorNew York, NY 10016Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | DECORATIVE PILLOWS, NON-METAL SHOWER CURTAIN HOOKS | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | CERAMIC, PLASTIC, RESIN AND METAL TUMBLERS, SOAP DISHES, SOAP DISPENSERS, SHAMPOO DISPENSERS, LOTION DISPENSERS, TOOTHBRUSH HOLDERS, TOILET PAPER HOLDERS, TISSUE HOLDERS, JARS FOR DISPENSING COTTON BALLS, TOILET BOWL BRUSHES, WASTEBASKETS | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | TEXTILE GOODS, NAMELY, QUILTS, COMFORTERS, COMFORTER CASES, AFGHANS, COVERLETS, DUVETS, DUVET COVERS, BED BLANKETS, BLANKET THROWS, BEDSPREADS, BED SHEETS, BED SKIRTS, PILLOW CASES, PILLOW SHAMS, DUST RUFFLES, CURTAINS, DRAPERIES, FABRIC VALANCES, CURTAIN TIE-BACKS, CURTAIN PANELS, TABLE CLOTHS NOT OF PAPER, BATH TOWELS, HAND TOWELS, WASH CLOTHS, FINGERTIP TOWELS, WASH MITTS, FABRIC AND VINYL SHOWER CURTAINS, VINYL SHOWER CURTAIN LINERS, TEXTILE WALL HANGINGS | ACTIVE | — |
| 027 | RUGS, FABRIC AND LEATHER BATH MATS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Pem America, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 027
- Similar marks named HAMPTON BAY
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 2, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 18, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 18, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 3, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 3, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 29, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |