USPTO serial 77101128
IOWA VALLEY FARMS QUALITY HALAL BEEF FROM AMERICA'S HEARTLAND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHOS, JOHN E
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IOWA VALLEY FARMS QUALITY HALAL BEEF FROM AMERICA'S HEARTLAND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Cedar Rapids, IA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert W. Hoke
Robert W. Hoke Nyemaster GoodePO Box 8870Cedar Rapids, IA 52408-8870UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | MEAT; POULTRY; PROCESSED MEAT; PROCESSED POULTRY; CANNED COOKED MEAT; FROZEN AND CANNED VEGETABLES; FROZEN AND CANNED FRUIT; FROZEN, PREPARED AND PACKAGED ENTREES CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF MEAT, FISH, POULTRY OR VEGETABLES; FROZEN, PREPARED AND PACKAGED VEGETARIAN ENTREES; SNACK FOOD, NAMELY CHEESE; POTATO-BASED SNACK FOOD; SNACK FOOD, NAMELY, BEEF JERKY, TURKEY JERKY AND FISH JERKY; DEHYDRATED FRUIT SNACKS; FRUIT AND SOY BASED SNACK FOOD; FRUIT-BASED SNACK FOOD; PROTEIN BASED, NUTRIENT-DENSE SNACK BARS; SNACK DIPS, SALSA AND OTHER SAUCES USED AS DIPS; HUMMUS CHICK PEA PASTE; SOY-BASED SNACK FOODS AND VEGETABLE-BASED SNACK FOODS; SOUPS | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | FROZEN, PREPARED AND PACKAGED ENTREES CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF PASTA OR RICE; SNACKS, NAMELY, CEREAL-BASED SNACK FOODS; PIZZA; BREAD | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 2, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 27, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |