USPTO serial 77101229
NEW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWERS, ALEXANDER L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NEW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
VANCOUVER, B.C., CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES E. SHLESINGER
JAMES E. SHLESINGER SHLESINGER, ARKWRIGHT & GARVEY LLP1420 KING ST STE 600ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-2750UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRONIC PUBLICATIONS, NAMELY, MAGAZINES AND PERIODICALS, NEWSLETTERS, BROCHURES, LEAFLETS, MAGAZINE SUPPLEMENTS FOR NEWSPAPERS, FEATURING PRESS REPORTS AND MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST, ALL RECORDED ON COMPUTER MEDIA | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | MAGAZINE COLUMNS ABOUT PRESS REPORTS AND MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST; MAGAZINES FEATURING PRESS REPORTS AND MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST; PRINTED PERIODICALS AND PRESS REPORTS IN THE FIELD OF MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST; JOURNALS CONCERNING PRESS REPORTS AND MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | PUBLICATION OF MAGAZINES AND PERIODICALS, NEWSLETTERS, BROCHURES, LEAFLETS, MAGAZINE SUPPLEMENTS FOR NEWSPAPERS IN PRINT AND ELECTRONIC FORMAT | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 21, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 24, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 29, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |