USPTO serial 77102056
MAKING IDEAS SOAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAKING IDEAS SOAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Heidi L. Sachs
HEIDI L. SACHS PERKINS COIE, LLP1201 THIRD AVENUE, SUITE 4800SEATTLE, WA 98101-3099UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware for launch, operation, and retrieval of unmanned aerial vehicles; Computer hardware, namely, data processors, satellite signal processors, signal processors, video processors, mobile data receivers and radar receivers; Computer software for gathering, analyzing, transmitting, maintaining and organizing data and images for intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance purposes, for control of remote ground control systems used in launching, operating, and retrieving unmanned aerial vehicles, and for airborne control of unmanned aerial vehicles; Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) components, namely, acceleration sensors, ultrasonic sensors, timing sensors, proximity sensors, temperature sensors, vehicle mounted GPS sensors for determining the rate of motion for a vehicle, motion sensors, pollutant sensors, biological sensors, chemical sensors, nuclear contamination sensors, pressure sensors, inertial navigation sensors and avionic sensor systems, namely, aircraft airspeed, altitude, and attitude sensors; Aircraft, airplane and unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) components and ground control components, namely, remote ground control terminals comprised of manipulators for remote operation of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and cameras, remote ground controls for unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and cameras, computer hardware for remote ground control of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and cameras; Radio, electronic, electro-magnetic, satellite, infrared, fiber-optic and optical data links comprised of ground control systems and airborne data systems that allow the unmanned aerial vehicle to be controlled by the ground operators and further allow data to be transmitted from the unmanned aerial vehicle to the ground operators; Ground control systems for use with unmanned aerial vehicles consisting of computer hardware and LAN, VPN and WAN operating software, video monitors, antennas, display processors, namely processors to enhance, clarify, magnify, manipulate, store and transmit displays of images, data, videos, graphics, and photographs, and video receivers; Computer software for controlling remote controls for unmanned aerial vehicles; Flight simulators for training in the use of UAVs to simulate unmanned aerial vehicle flight; Computer software featuring programs used for interactive training courseware in the field of use of unmanned aerial vehicles; Video tapes featuring training in and utilization of unmanned aerial vehicles; Airborne surveillance and aircraft control apparatus, namely, radars, low light cameras, thermal imaging cameras, GPS satellite receivers, radio altimeters, inertial navigation systems for vehicles and ground proximity sensors; Reconnaissance and surveillance apparatus, namely, electric and electronic video, audio, and data surveillance installations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 15, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 13, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 19, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 30, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 11, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 29, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |