USPTO serial 77102058
INTEGRATOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INTEGRATOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Heidi L. Sachs
Heidi L. Sachs PERKINS COIE, LLP1201 Third AvenueSuite 4800SEATTLE, WA 98101-3099Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for gathering, analyzing, transmitting, maintaining and organizing data and images for intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance purposes, for control of remote ground control systems used in launching, operating, and retrieving unmanned aerial vehicles, and for airborne control of unmanned aerial vehicles; Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) components, namely, acceleration sensors, ultrasonic sensors, timing sensors, proximity sensors, temperature sensors, vehicle mounted GPS sensors for determining the rate of motion for a vehicle, motion sensors, pollutant sensors, biological sensors, chemical sensors, nuclear contamination sensors, pressure sensors, inertial navigation sensors and avionic sensor systems, namely, aircraft airspeed, altitude, and attitude sensors; Aircraft, airplane and unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) components and ground control components, namely, remote ground control terminals comprised of manipulators for remote operation of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and cameras, remote ground controls for unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and cameras, computer hardware for remote ground control of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and cameras; Radio, electronic, electro-magnetic, satellite, infrared, fiber-optic and optical data links comprised of ground control systems and airborne data systems that allow the unmanned aerial vehicle to be controlled by the ground operators and further allow data to be transmitted from the unmanned aerial vehicle to the ground operators; Ground control systems for use with unmanned aerial vehicles consisting of computer hardware and LAN, VPN and WAN operating software, video monitors, antennas, display processors, namely, processors to enhance, clarify, magnify, manipulate, store and transmit displays of images, data, videos, graphics, and photographs, and video receivers; Computer software for controlling remote controls for unmanned aerial vehicles; Flight simulators for training in the use of UAVs to simulate unmanned aerial vehicle flight; Computer software featuring programs used for interactive training courseware in the field of use of unmanned aerial vehicles; Video tapes featuring training in and utilization of unmanned aerial vehicles; Airborne surveillance and aircraft control apparatus, namely, radars, low light cameras, thermal imaging cameras, GPS satellite receivers, radio altimeters, inertial navigation systems for vehicles and ground proximity sensors; Reconnaissance and surveillance apparatus, namely, electric and electronic video, audio, and data surveillance installations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 9, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 21, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 16, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 7, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 5, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 16, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 16, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 7, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 8, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 15, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 26, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 29, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |