USPTO serial 77102565
MM - 80
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENJAMIN, SARA NICOLE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MM - 80?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert H. Rines
ROBERT H. RINES RINES AND RINES24 WARREN STCONCORD, NH 03301-4048UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | semi-rigid epoxy resins for filling and sealing joints in industrial and other concrete floors subjected to the action of hard-wheel vehicles otherwise breaking edges of the joints and for the repairing of damaged joint edges | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 1973 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2008 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 1, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 4, 2008 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 20, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 20, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 31, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 11, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |