Drawing for ADELITA

USPTO serial 77103004

ADELITA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MEYERS, MORGAN LAURA
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ADELITA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anthony R. Masiello

ANTHONY R. MASIELLO HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP2099 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20006-6800UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025FootwearABANDONEDOct 19, 2006

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 2, 2008MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION
Jun 2, 2008ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION
Jun 2, 2008OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Jun 2, 2008OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999
Feb 4, 2008OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Sep 5, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Aug 7, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 18, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jul 3, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 3, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 30, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 30, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 22, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 22, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 18, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 17, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 17, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 28, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 28, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 28, 2007RFTPREMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS
Apr 17, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 14, 2007MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED
Feb 13, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance