Drawing for PURE WATER. DELIVERED.

USPTO serial 77103164

PURE WATER. DELIVERED.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RINGLE, JAMES W
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PURE WATER. DELIVERED.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas P. Murphy

THOMAS P. MURPHY BERLINER COHEN10 ALMADEN BOULEVARDSUITE 1100SAN JOSE, CA 95113-2233

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Water conditioning units; water purifiers; water softening units; water sterilizing units; water filtering units for domestic use; water filtering units for commercial use; water filtering units for industrial use; water treatment equipment, namely, acid neutralizing units, faucets, faucets which meter the flow of water, membrane filtration units, reverse osmosis units, ion exchange unitsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 27, 2007MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Nov 27, 2007ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Nov 26, 2007EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
May 29, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 29, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 29, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 13, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance