USPTO serial 77103750
ELIXIR GREEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CAPSHAW, DANIEL
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ELIXIR GREEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph Quigley
Joseph Quigley Limited Brands5 Limited ParkwayREYNOLDSBURG, OH 43068-5300UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | acne treatment preparations, aloe-Vera gel for the treatment of skin abrasions, anti-itch lotion, anti-itch cream, anti-itch ointment, antiseptic gel, aspirin, medicated blemish pads, skin blemish preparations, medicated body lotion, medicated chest balm, pharmaceuticals for the treatment of cold sores, cough and cold treatments, dandruff shampoo, medicated foot powder, insect repellant, liniment oil spray, liniments, medicated lip salve, medicated lozenges, medicated mouthwash, nutritional supplements, nutritionally fortified beverages, styptic pencil, vitamins | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 5, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 26, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 20, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2012 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 23, 2012 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 23, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 6, 2011 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 6, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 30, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 28, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 24, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 23, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 14, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 6, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 14, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 24, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 28, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 28, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 8, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 3, 2009 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Apr 23, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 30, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 18, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |