USPTO serial 77103777
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert A. Schachter
MARC A LAVAIA ROBINSON BROG LEINWAND GREENE ET AL875 THIRD AVENUE9TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10022| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | Bath towels; Bed blankets; Bed linen; Bed sheets; Comforters; Dust ruffles; Fitted toilet lid covers; Pillow cases; Pillow shams; Table cloths not of paper; Table linen; Table linen, namely textile placemats | ABANDONED | — |
| 025 | Athletic footwear; Bathing suits; Belts made of leather; Body suits; Bras; Bustiers; Camisoles; Dress shirts; Footwear; Gloves; Headgear, namely, hats and caps; Jeans; Knit shirts; Ladies' suits; Leather coats; Leather jackets; Leather shoes; Lingerie; Loungewear; Men's suits; Over coats; Panties; Pants; Polo shirts; Rain coats; Scarves; Shirts; Sleepwear; Slippers; Socks; Sweat shirts; Sweaters; T-shirts; Ties; Underwear | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 2013 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 25, 2013 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 25, 2013 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 25, 2013 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 22, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 15, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 26, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 10, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 6, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |