USPTO serial 77105000
SINN RIDING COMPANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAMOTHE, LESLEY
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SINN RIDING COMPANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Beanies; Hats; Jackets; Pullovers; Socks; T-shirts; Underwear | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Pope, Shaun D
- Other trademarks owned by Pope, Shaun D
- Other trademarks owned by Stefko, Jesse W
- Other trademarks owned by Stefko, Jesse W
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named SINN RIDING COMPANY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 2009 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2009 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| May 14, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2009 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 27, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 4, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 11, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 21, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |