USPTO serial 77105121
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
HIRSCHMANN AUTOMATION AND CONTROL GMBH
Neckartenzlingen, DE
Other trademarks owned by HIRSCHMANN AUTOMATION AND CONTROL GMBH
HIRSCHMANN AUTOMATION AND CONTROL GMBH
Neckartenzlingen, DE
Other trademarks owned by HIRSCHMANN AUTOMATION AND CONTROL GMBH
HIRSCHMANN AUTOMATION AND CONTROL GMBH
Neckartenzlingen, DE
Other trademarks owned by HIRSCHMANN AUTOMATION AND CONTROL GMBH
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JONATHAN MYERS
JONATHAN MYERS KARL F. ROSS, P.C.5683 RIVERDALE AVE. BOX 900BRONX (RIVERDALE), NY 10471-0900UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | CUSTOMIZED DESIGNING FOR OTHERS OF ROUND PLUGS AND CONNECTORS IN M8 OR M12 DESIGN AND RECTANGULAR PLUG AND SOCKET CONNECTORS AND VALVE PLUG CONNECTORS, ALL OF THE ABOVE DESIGNED FOR USE WITH SENSORS FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE OF TRANSMITTING SENSOR SIGNALS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 30, 2007 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 25, 2010 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 20, 2010 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 2, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 9, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 5, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 25, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 12, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 30, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 9, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 9, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 26, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 21, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 24, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 14, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |