USPTO serial 77105185
S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 4, 2009
- Examiner
- DEFORD, JEFFREY S
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
VANCOUVER, CA
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
1215757 Ontario, Inc. o/a Saxon Chocolates
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Other trademarks owned by 1215757 Ontario, Inc. o/a Saxon Chocolates
1215757 Ontario, Inc. o/a Saxon Chocolates
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Other trademarks owned by 1215757 Ontario, Inc. o/a Saxon Chocolates
1215757 Ontario, Inc. o/a Saxon Chocolates
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Other trademarks owned by 1215757 Ontario, Inc. o/a Saxon Chocolates
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James R Menker
James R Menker Holley & Menker, PAPO Box 331937Atlantic Beach, FL 32233UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Belgian chocolates, namely, assorted chocolate truffles, chocolate dipped fortune cookies and assorted chocolate novelties; Belgian chocolate dipped pretzels, truffle cups and spoons, almond bark, chocolate hazelnut bark, Christmas bark and fondue dipping chocolate; chocolate dipped gingerbread cookies | ACTIVE | Sep 30, 1994 |
| 035 | Wholesale distributorship of Belgian chocolates; importation of Belgian Chocolates | ACTIVE | Sep 30, 1994 |
| 040 | Manufacturing of Belgian chocolates to the order of customers and retailers | ACTIVE | Sep 30, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GANACHE BRANDS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by 1000152386 ONTARIO INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SAXON CHOCOLATES LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by 1215757 Ontario, Inc. o/a Saxon Chocolates
- Other trademarks owned by 1215757 Ontario, Inc. o/a Saxon Chocolates
- Other trademarks owned by 1215757 Ontario, Inc. o/a Saxon Chocolates
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named S
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2023 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 23, 2022 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 27, 2022 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 2, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 2, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2021 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2020 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 12, 2018 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2018 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 12, 2018 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 12, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 3, 2018 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 1, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 1, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2015 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2015 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 28, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 29, 2015 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 19, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 29, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 13, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 8, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 6, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 2007 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |