Drawing for SCORPION VENOM

USPTO serial 77105219

SCORPION VENOM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MILLER, DAVID S
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SCORPION VENOM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Keith A. Weltsch

KEITH A. WELTSCH SCULLY, SCOTT, MURPHY & PRESSER, P.C.400 GARDEN CITY PLZ STE 300GARDEN CITY, NY 11530-3336UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cleansers for use in connection with bows and arrowsACTIVE—
028Waxes and lubricants for use in connection with bows and arrowsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 4, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 4, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 4, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 20, 2008EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jul 17, 2008GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 17, 2008GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 17, 2008CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jun 24, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 24, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 23, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 23, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 23, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 23, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 21, 2007GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 21, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 21, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 6, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 6, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 6, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 29, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 4, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 4, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 31, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 16, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance