Drawing for RECEIPT AND RESPOND

USPTO serial 77105521

RECEIPT AND RESPOND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SINGH, TEJBIR
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RECEIPT AND RESPOND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Beth M. Goldman

Beth M. Goldman Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP4 Park Plaza, Suite 1600Irvine, CA 92614-2558UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Providing loyalty and incentive programs to promote the sale of products and services of others; advertising services, namely, assisting retailers with customer loyalty and incentive programs by assisting with the sale of advertising space on point of sale receipts, emails, text messages and other consumer communications; advertising services, namely, tracking customer loyalty data and purchasing behavior resulting from such advertisingACTIVE—
036Payment and transaction processing services; credit card services; credit card transaction processing services; debit card services; debit card transaction processing services; providing stored value programs; financial services, namely, providing on-line stored value accounts in an electronic environment; issuing stored value cards; financial services, namely, operating an account-based system to process and support consumer, merchant, and corporate payment program transactionsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 28, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 28, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 1, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 26, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 26, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 5, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 5, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 10, 2008TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Dec 10, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 10, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 10, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 10, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 27, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 27, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 4, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 13, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 29, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 29, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 17, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 29, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 28, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 28, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 31, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 31, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 31, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 16, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance