Drawing for RED ROOSTER FOODS GOOD FOOD FOR ALL MANKIND

USPTO serial 77105719

RED ROOSTER FOODS GOOD FOOD FOR ALL MANKIND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BROWN, TINA
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with RED ROOSTER FOODS GOOD FOOD FOR ALL MANKIND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ronald S. Vickery

2120 HOLLY CREEK DR.TYLER, TX 75703UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Bean dip; Cheese food; Chile con queso; Dairy-based dips; Dairy-based snack foods excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; Dips; Snack dips; Snack food dips; SoupsABANDONED—
030Bakery desserts; Bakery goods; Bakery products; Bakery products, namely, sweet bakery goods; Chocolate topping; Fresh pasta; Ice cream; Ice cream mixes; Pasta; Pimiento used as a condimentABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 17, 2009MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jun 17, 2009ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jun 17, 2009OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jun 17, 2009OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Apr 24, 2008OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Apr 24, 2008OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 25, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 5, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 15, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 2, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 28, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 28, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 19, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 8, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 8, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 9, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 31, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 17, 2007MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Feb 16, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance