USPTO serial 77105918
PROVAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POVARCHUK, REBECCA JOYCE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PROVAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JONATHAN MYERS
JONATHAN MYERS KF ROSS PC5683 Riverdale Avenue - PO BOX 900SUITE 203BRONX (RIVERDALE), NY 10471-0900Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | SCIENTIFIC, NAUTICAL, SURVEYING, ELECTRIC, ELECTRONIC, OPTO-ELECTRONIC, PHOTOGRAPHIC, CINEMATOGRAPHIC, OPTICAL, WEIGHING, MEASURING, SIGNALING, CHECKING AND SUPERVISION APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY, OPTICAL DETECTORS IN THE NATURE OF OPTICAL CHARACTER READERS AND OPTICAL SCANNERS, OPTICAL LENSES FOR SCANNING OR READING CHARACTERS IN A TELEFAXING OR COPYING APPARATUS; PHOTOGRAPHIC, CINEMATOGRAPHIC AND PROJECTION OBJECTIVES, NAMELY, COMBINATIONS OF PHOTOGRAPHIC LENSES FOR USE WITH CAMERAS, ENLARGERS AND PROJECTORS; LIGHT METERS, OPTICAL REFLECTORS, CONDENSERS, DIAPHRAGMS FOR CAMERAS, OPTICAL POWER SPLITTERS, DIGITAL SIGNAL PROCESSORS; PROJECTOR LAMPS AND FLASH LAMPS FOR CAMERAS; APPARATUS FOR RECORDING, TRANSMISSION OR REPRODUCTION OF SOUND AND IMAGES, NAMELY, FILM CAMERAS, VIDEO CAMERAS, PHOTOGRAPHIC PROJECTORS, OPTICAL/ELECTRICAL TRANSDUCERS, ELECTRICAL/OPTICAL TRANSDUCERS, FLAT PANEL DISPLAY SCREENS, ELECTRIC LUMINESCENT DISPLAY PANELS; BLANK MAGNETIC DATA CARRIERS; DATA PROCESSING EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, COMPUTERS, COMPUTER INTERFACE BOARDS, OPTICAL COMPUTER INPUTS, NAMELY, INTERFACES; PRINTED CIRCUIT CARDS FOR INTERFACING COMPUTERS AND OPTICAL CHARACTER RECOGNITION DEVICES, NAMELY INTERFACES; LENSES FOR USE WITH PHOTOGRAPHIC AND CINEMATOGRAPHIC CAMERAS; LENSES FOR USE IN AND FOR USE WITH PHOTOGRAPHIC AND CINEMATOGRAPHIC PROJECTORS; OPTICAL GLASSES, OPTICAL FIBERS SOLD AS A COMPONENT OF FIBER OPTICAL CABLES, FILTERS, NAMELY, OPTICAL FILTERS, CAMERA FILTERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | DESIGN OF PHOTOGRAPHIC, CINEMATOGRAPHIC AND PROJECTION OBJECTIVES, NAMELY, COMBINATIONS OF PHOTOGRAPHIC LENSES FOR USE WITH CAMERAS, ENLARGERS AND PROJECTORS AND OF OPTICAL RECORDING, TRANSMISSION AND REPRODUCTION SYSTEMS FOR USERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by JOS. SCHNEIDER OPTISCHE WERKE GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by JOS. SCHNEIDER OPTISCHE WERKE GMBH
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named PROVAR
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 28, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 28, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 9, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2011 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 9, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 1, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 21, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 20, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 28, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 8, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 28, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 5, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 16, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 11, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |