USPTO serial 77106027
PURE CONCEPT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRADLEY, EVELYN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PURE CONCEPT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Montreal (St-Laurent), CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PATRICK A. PERLUZZO
PATRICK A. PERLUZZO MARTINO, PERLUZZO, ATTORNEYSSUITE 23501010 SHERBROOKE STREET WESTMONTREAL QUEBEC, H3A2R7Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Skin, body, facial and hand care products, namely, creams, lotions, moisturizers, oils and cleansers; perfumery, namely, colognes, perfumes, and fragrances for personal use; body lotions; shaving balms; after-shave balms; after-shave lotions; cosmetics and beauty products, namely, face make-up, blush, eye make-up, eye shadow, lip gloss, lipsticks, mascara and nail polish; personal care products and bath toiletries, namely, hair conditioners, deodorants, shampoos, bath gels and cosmetic soaps | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 2009 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 8, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 27, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 18, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |