Drawing for DIGESTIVE FACTORS

USPTO serial 77106065

DIGESTIVE FACTORS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CANTONE, KERI H
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with DIGESTIVE FACTORS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Dietary and nutritional supplements formulated to help digestionACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 19, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 19, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 21, 2014GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 21, 2014GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 21, 2014CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jul 10, 2014RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 24, 2013GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 24, 2013GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 24, 2013CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 6, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 6, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 2, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 26, 2013ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jun 4, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 4, 2013GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 4, 2013GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 4, 2013CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jun 4, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 30, 2013RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Nov 30, 2012GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 30, 2012GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 30, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 30, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 30, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 27, 2012ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jun 7, 2012GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2012GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2012CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jun 6, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 3, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 3, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 24, 2012ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2011GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 19, 2011GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 19, 2011CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jun 13, 2011RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 13, 2010GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 13, 2010GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 13, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 7, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 7, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 2, 2010ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jul 2, 2010GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 2, 2010GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 2, 2010CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jun 30, 2010RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 17, 2009GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 17, 2009GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 17, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 14, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 14, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 10, 2009ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jul 1, 2009GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 1, 2009GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 1, 2009CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jun 19, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 18, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 18, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 18, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 17, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 17, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 16, 2008ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2008GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 10, 2008GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 10, 2008CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jul 8, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 8, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 8, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 8, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 8, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 6, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 6, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 6, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 10, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 10, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 10, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 1, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 26, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 26, 2007COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 17, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance