Drawing for PHOTOACTIVE

USPTO serial 77106213

PHOTOACTIVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SERVANCE, RENEE L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PHOTOACTIVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Margaret Polson

Margaret Polson Patent Law Offices of Rick Martin, PCPO Box 1839Longmont, CO 80502UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Displaying advertisements for others on the Internet; dissemination of advertisements and of advertising material, namely, flyers, brochures, leaflets and samplesACTIVE—
039Electronic storage of photographs via the InternetACTIVE—
040Internet based photographic processing and printing of photographs; custom imprinting of user's photographs for promotional and advertising purposes on the goods of others, namely, imprinting on mugs, calendars, cards, and clothingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 18, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 18, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 16, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 16, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 14, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 14, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 15, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 22, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 2, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 14, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 14, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 7, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 7, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 7, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 7, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 18, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 18, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 18, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 4, 2007GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 4, 2007CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 1, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 20, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Feb 17, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance