USPTO serial 77106360
THE VERY FIRST NOEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BEN, LINDSEY HEATHER
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE VERY FIRST NOEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Diane L. Gardner
Diane L. Gardner Mastermind IP Law P.C.421 Santa Marina CourtEscondido, CA 92029UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Toys, namely, baby and children's multiple activity toys; bath toys; battery-operated action toys; bean bag dolls; bendable toys; children's play cosmetics; collectible plastic toy figurines; construction toys; crib toys; disc-type toss toys; dolls; doll accessories; doll clothes; doll furniture; doll houses; drawing toys; electric action toy; electronic action toys; electronic learning toys; electronic talking dolls; electronic toy vehicles; fantasy character toys; hobby craft kits comprised of crayons, chalk, colored pencils, paper, paints, clay, and plastic craft components, for making two-dimensional or three-dimensional artwork or playthings; hobby horses; infant's rattles; infant toys; inflatable bath toys; kites; lever action toys; mechanical toys; modeled plastic toy figurines; molded toy figures; music box toys; musical toys; non-electric toy vehicles; paper dolls; party favors in the nature of small toys; pinatas; plastic character toys; play mats containing infant toys; plush toys; pop up toys; porcelain dolls; positionable toy figures; printing toys; pull toys; puppets; push toys; rag dolls; ride-on toys; rocking horses; rubber character toys; sand toys; sandbox toys; sketching toys; soft sculpture toys; spinning tops; squeeze toys; stacking toys; stuffed toys; swim floats; talking toys; toy action figures; toy badminton sets; toy banks; toy bows and arrows; toy boxes; toy building blocks; toy clocks and watches; toy film cartridges and viewers; toy furniture; toy houses; toy masks; toy mobiles; toy model cars; toy model train sets; toy model trucks; toy model walkie talkies; toy modeling dough; toy noisemakers; toy pianos; toy putty; toy record players; toy robots; toy rockets; toy scooters; toy sets of carpenters' tools; toy snow globes; toy stamps; toy water globes; toy wind socks; transforming robotic toys; twirling batons; water squirting toys; wind up toys and yo-yo's; games and playthings, namely, action skill games, action target games, amusement game machines, arcade games, board games, card games, dart games, dice games, electronic educational game machines for children, equipment sold as a unit for playing a memory game, handheld units for playing electronic games, marbles, party games, and puzzles; sporting articles, namely, baseball bats, baseball mitts, basketballs, basket ball hoops, fishing tackle, flutter boards, footballs, golf balls, golf ball markers, jump ropes, nets for ball games, paddle balls, playground balls, roller skates, rubber action balls, skateboards, roller, ice, and in-line skates, skis, skittles, soccer balls, sports balls, tether balls, tennis balls, trampolines, volley balls, and wake boards; holiday decorations, namely, Christmas stockings, Christmas tree decorations, Christmas tree ornaments, Christmas tree skirts, and Christmas tree stands | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 12, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 16, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2011 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 24, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 15, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 9, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 12, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 2, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 12, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 4, 2008 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 30, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 2, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 7, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 6, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 1, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 15, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |