Drawing for PRIMO HPCVD

USPTO serial 77106377

PRIMO HPCVD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MIZELLE HOWARD, DEZMONA JULYE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PRIMO HPCVD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Norm J. Rich

NORM J. RICH FOLEY & LARDNER LLP3000 K ST NWSTE 500WASHINGTON, DC 20007-5143

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037Installation, maintenance and repair of semiconductor wafer processing equipment and components for use therewith; installation, maintenance and repair of deposition processing equipment, etch processing equipment, electrochemical plating equipment, rapid thermal processing equipment, chemical mechanical polishers, and supporting frames and parts thereof; installation, maintenance and repair of vacuum processing equipment and components for use therewith; installation, maintenance and repair of liquid crystal display processing equipment, flat panel display processing equipment, vacuum plating equipment, optical coating equipment, and supporting frames and parts thereofACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 22, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 22, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 14, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 14, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 14, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 20, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 26, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 6, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 20, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 20, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 7, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 26, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 26, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 26, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 5, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 4, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 1, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 20, 2007MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Feb 17, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance