Drawing for OPERATION SPY GIRL

USPTO serial 77106422

OPERATION SPY GIRL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FARRELL, ANNE M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OPERATION SPY GIRL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles P. LaPolla

Charles P. LaPolla OSTROLENK FABER LLP7TH FLOOR1180 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-8403

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment in the nature of amusement park shows; production and distribution of theatrical shows and exhibitions, motion picture films, videos, DVDs, disks and television programs featuring fictional stories, shows and characters, all based upon amusement park shows; fan clubs relating to the foregoingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 4, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 22, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 22, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 16, 2010ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 27, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Apr 26, 2010EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 26, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 5, 2010EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 5, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 22, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 21, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 21, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 7, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 7, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 21, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 21, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 21, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 8, 2008ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Jul 10, 2008ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jun 24, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 4, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 16, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 15, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 5, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 5, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 5, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 5, 2008PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Jan 22, 2008APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Jan 10, 2008PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jan 10, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 29, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 28, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 28, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 17, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance