Drawing for CHILE PORK SAFE & TASTY

USPTO serial 77106441

CHILE PORK SAFE & TASTY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BIBB, SCOTT
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHILE PORK SAFE & TASTY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David Ehrlich

DAVID EHRLICH FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, P.C.866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017-1822UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Advertising and promotional services for all types of goods and services related to the Chilean pork industryACTIVE—
041Organization of exhibitions for cultural and educational purposes; providing information in the fields of entertainment and recreation; arranging and conducting of colloquiums, conferences, congresses, seminars, workshops and symposiums for debate, cultural and educational purposes all in the field of the Chilean pork industry; electronic publishing services, namely, publication of text and graphic works of others on CD, DVD and on-line format featuring information on the subject of the Chilean pork industry; desktop publishing for others; editorial reporting services; publication of books and magazines concerning the Chilean pork industryACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 27, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 27, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 23, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 23, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 23, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 24, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 1, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 12, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 25, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 23, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 22, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 22, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 22, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 20, 2008ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 3, 2007PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Nov 20, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 8, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 8, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 8, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 8, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 20, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 20, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 27, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 4, 2007CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 1, 2007CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 1, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 6, 2007AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Apr 6, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 5, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2007MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Feb 17, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance