USPTO serial 77106462
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Tnuva Central Cooperative For The Marketing of Agricultural Produce In Israel Ltd.
Ramat Hasharon 47100, IL
Tnuva Central Cooperative For The Marketing of Agricultural Produce In Israel Ltd.
Ramat Hasharon 47100, IL
Tnuva Central Cooperative For The Marketing of Agricultural Produce In Israel Ltd.
Ramat Hasharon 47100, IL
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michelle P. Foxman
MICHELLE P. FOXMAN FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, P.C.866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017-1822UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | soy based food products, namely, dried and processed soy beans, soy bean oil, soy based snacks, tofu, soy based cheese, soy based meat substitutes, soy based poultry substitutes, soy protein for use as a food additive, soy based yogurts, soy cream, soy bean extracts for use as whiteners for coffee, soy based beverages, namely, soy milk in liquid and solid form | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | soy based food products, namely, soy flour, soy flour for food, soy based ice cream, soy based puddings; soy sauce, sauces made of soy, bread improvers containing soy in the nature of food leavening agents, soy based shakes and bases for making soy based shakes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 032 | SOY BASED BEVERAGES NOT INTENDED AS A MILK SUBSTITUTE AND PREPARATIONS FOR MAKING SOY-BASED BEVERAGES NOT INTENDED AS A MILK SUBSTITUTE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 8, 2009 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 3, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 11, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 11, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 2, 2008 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 18, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| May 24, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 23, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 23, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 23, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 5, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |