USPTO serial 77106674
PERCUNAV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 25, 2018
- Examiner
- HERRERA-MARCUS, ROSELLE MORALDE
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.
Need help with PERCUNAV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ZACHARY A. KINNAIRD
ZACHARY A. KINNAIRD PHILIPS IP&S1600 SUMMER STREET - 5th FLSTAMFORD, CT 06905United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software for use in image guided surgery; computer software for integrating views of a patient with the tracked position of tools or instruments for use in computer assisted surgery; computer software for medical use in computer assisted image guided diagnostic and intervention systems; computer hardware for medical use; computer hardware for medical devices; computer software for medical devices used for image guided diagnosis and intervention; surgery planning software; surgery planning software for use in image guided surgery; tool identification software used for use in image guided surgery; navigation software for image guided surgery | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 2008 |
| 010 | Medical devices, namely, registration and automatic registration devices for image guided surgery; image guided surgery systems, sold as unit, namely, computer hardware and software and application tools and instruments and component parts therefor for tracking surgical instrument location; computer assisted surgery systems consisting of computer hardware and software for image guided surgery, spatial position sensors, tool interface units for tracking tools; medical devices that use computer software for integrating representations of application tools and instruments with images of patients obtained by imaging modalities, namely, Computed Tomography (CT), Magnetic Resonant Imaging (MR), and Positron Emission Tomography (PET); medical devices for integrating representations of application tools and instruments with images of patients or navigation of instruments using computer software in workstations for medical use in computer assisted, image guided diagnostic and intervention; medical devices for integrating representations of application tools and instruments with images of patients or for navigation of instruments, the devices being, namely, medical ultrasound equipment, sensors, probes, workstations, electro-magnetic generators, transducers and tracking devices, using computer software for image guided diagnosis and intervention; computer assisted image guided surgery sensors, probes, medical ultrasound equipment, workstations, electro-magnetic generators, transducers and tracking devices; computer assisted image guided surgery medical ultrasound equipment, sensors, probes, workstations, electro-magnetic generators, transducers and tracking devices for guiding instruments using pre-operative and intra-operative images; computer assisted image guided surgery medical ultrasound equipment, sensors, probes, workstations, electro-magnetic generators, transducers and tracking devices for providing 3-dimensional visualization and navigation of instruments; medical devices using surgery planning software; computer assisted surgery medical ultrasound equipment, sensors, probes, workstations, electro-magnetic generators, transducers and tracking devices and for integrating representations of application tools and instruments with images of patients or navigation of instruments; image guided surgery, medical ultrasound equipment, sensors, probes, workstations, electro-magnetic generators, transducers and tracking devices for integrating representations of application tools and instruments with images of patients or navigation of instruments; medical devices using surgery planning software for use in image guided surgery; medical devices using tool identification software used for use in image guided surgery; medical devices using navigation software for image guided surgery; surgical apparatus sold as a unit, namely, mobile system cart for use in image guided surgery all being hardware and computer systems for medical use; surgical apparatus sold as a unit, namely, mobile system cart having electro-magnetic field generator, computer workstation and instrument connection unit, all being hardware and computer systems for medical use; image guided surgery cart having electromagnetic field generator, computer work station and connections for medical instruments and devices; image guided surgery workstation; Surgical instruments and apparatus, namely, tracked stylettes, tracked cannula pairs; Medical ultrasound equipment, namely, tracked ultrasound transducer; tracking devices for medical surgery instruments to track the position and orientation of medical instruments during image guided surgery; surgical instruments and apparatus, namely, trackers for use in image guided surgery, stylette pairs; computer assisted surgery systems consisting primarily of computer hardware and software for image guided surgery, spatial position sensors, tool interface units for tracking tools, computer software for integrating representations of application tools and instruments with images of patients obtained by imaging modalities, namely, Computed Tomography (CT), Magnetic Resonant Imaging (MR), and Positron Emission Tomography (PET) | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Traxtal Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Traxtal Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by PHILIPS ELECTRONICS LTD PHILIPS ELECTRONIQUE LTEE
- Other trademarks owned by PHILIPS ELECTRONICS LTD PHILIPS ELECTRONIQUE LTEE
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named PERCUNAV
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2025 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2025 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 16, 2025 | PUNQ | OFFICE ACTION ISSUED- NO RESPONSE REQUIRED POU | — |
| Feb 24, 2025 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2024 | PUM1 | OFFICE ACTION ISSUED POU1 | — |
| Aug 26, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 21, 2024 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2023 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 18, 2018 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2018 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 26, 2018 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 10, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2018 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 5, 2018 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2018 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 5, 2018 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 25, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2017 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 21, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 11, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 28, 2017 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 7, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 13, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 23, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 19, 2016 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 19, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 19, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 17, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2016 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 26, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 26, 2016 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 15, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 15, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 1, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 18, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 28, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 3, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 14, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 14, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 18, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 11, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 17, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 17, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 16, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 26, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 16, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 15, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 10, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 5, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 4, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 7, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 7, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 9, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2007 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 8, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |