USPTO serial 77106714
EXCLA!M
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BEN, LINDSEY HEATHER
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EXCLA!M?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Dallas, TX
Dallas, TX
DALLAS, TX
DALLAS, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Diane L. Gardner
Diane L. Gardner Mastermind IP Law P.C.421 Santa Marina CourtEscondido, CA 92029UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, motion picture film production and distribution, production of video recordings, animation production services, production of computer generated images for computer game software, production of audio, video and audio-visual recordings, providing websites featuring musical performance, music videos, related film clips, photographs, and other multimedia materials, production of visual effects for others for use in DVDs, laser disks, television programs, motion pictures, digital recordings and websites, on-going television programs in the field of children's entertainment, providing fan club services and providing theme park services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Reel FX, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Reel FX, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by EXCLAIM ENTERTAINMENT, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by EXCLAIM ENTERTAINMENT, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named EXCLA!M
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 21, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 24, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 11, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 24, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 24, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 26, 2008 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 29, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 7, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 2, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 7, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 6, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 1, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 15, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |