USPTO serial 77106782
SPORT BEANS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMIGA, HOWARD
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SPORT BEANS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles R. Cypher
Charles R. Cypher LAW OFFICES OF JAMES R. CYPHER409 13th Street, 11th FloorOakland, CA 94612UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | protective helmets for sports | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | clothing for sports for men, women and children, namely, shorts, pants, t-shirts, sleeveless shirts, shirts with collars, tank tops, tankinis; training and warm-up suits, rain proof and wind-resistant jackets, skirts and skirt/short combinations, sweaters, underwear, socks, sweatbands, bathing suits, hats, caps, and visors; cycling apparel, namely, booties, caps, gloves, headbands, jackets, jerseys, muffs, shirts, pants, socks, shorts, tights, leg and arm warmers and trousers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 7, 2008 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2008 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 4, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 25, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 26, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |