USPTO serial 77107214
SABLELUX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 26, 2008
- Examiner
- MAKHDOOM, SAIMA
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with SABLELUX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
R. Joseph Trojan
R. Joseph Trojan Trojan Law Offices9250 Wilshire Blvd., Ste. 325Beverly Hills, CA 90212United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | ULTRAVIOLET LAMPS AND FIXTURES FOR NON-MEDICAL PURPOSES; BLACK LIGHT LAMPS AND FIXTURES; FLUORESCENT LAMPS AND FIXTURES; ULTRAVIOLET LAMPS AND FIXTURES FOR THEATRICAL LIGHTING; BLACK LIGHT LAMPS AND FIXTURES FOR THEATRICAL LIGHTING; FLUORESCENT LAMPS AND FIXTURES FOR THEATRICAL LIGHTING | ACTIVE | Mar 26, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 28, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 25, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2018 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2018 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 28, 2018 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 28, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 17, 2018 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2013 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2013 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Sep 11, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 3, 2013 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2013 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 21, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 28, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2008 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | RGRR | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 13, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 12, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 28, 2007 | IUAL | UNTIMELY AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 17, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |