Drawing for SYNCHRONICITY 2

USPTO serial 77107745

SYNCHRONICITY 2

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRADLEY, EVELYN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SYNCHRONICITY 2?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anthony J. Spotora, Managing Attorney

ANTHONY J. SPOTORA, MANAGING ATTORNEY SPOTORA & ASSOCIATES, P.C.1801 CENTURY PARK E FL 24LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-2302UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment services, namely, the production of reality based television shows and motion pictures; Entertainment services, namely, the production of scripted television shows and motion picturesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 8, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 8, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 18, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 17, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 14, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 14, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 23, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 22, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 22, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 23, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 23, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 5, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 13, 2009NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 13, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 5, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 2, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 2, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 2, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 2, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 2, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 22, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 22, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 22, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 22, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 22, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 20, 2007GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 20, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 20, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 29, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 29, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 29, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 25, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 25, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 23, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 21, 2007MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Feb 20, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance