USPTO serial 77108028
BEVYZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3510587Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 7, 2008
- Examiner
- CORWIN, KEVIN SCOTT
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BEVYZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Amy L. Brosius
Amy L. Brosius Keurig Green Mountain, Inc.33 Coffee LaneWaterbury, VT 05676UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Electrical apparatus for preparing and dispensing chilled and hot drinks, namely, hot and cold beverage dispensing units and electric coffee and tea makers for domestic, commercial and industrial use; Apparatus for refrigerating drinks to be used in combination with tap fittings and pumps for dispensing chilled drinks, namely, refrigerated beverage dispensing units; Apparatus for heating drinks to be used in combination with tap fittings and pumps for dispensing hot drinks, namely, heated beverage dispensing units | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | [ Coffee, prepared coffee-based beverages; Coffee extracts; Coffee substitutes; Mixtures of coffee and coffee substitutes; Mixtures consisting primarily of coffee and coffee substitutes with milk powder; Mixtures consisting primarily of coffee with cereals, fruit and herbs, for use as a coffee based beverage, as artificial coffee, and as a coffee substitute; Tea, non-alcoholic tea-based beverages, tea-extracts and tea-substitutes; Cocoa, cocoa-based beverages, chocolate and chocolate extracts in liquid form; Processed herbs for making and brewing beverages; Mixtures consisting primarily of processed herbs with the addition of dried fruits for use in the preparation of beverages; Decoctions of herbs, not for medical use ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 032 | [ Beer; Mineral water; Aerated water; Non-alcoholic drinks, namely, carbonated beverages, beverages containing fruit juices, and punch; Fruit drinks and fruit juices; Syrups and other preparations for making beverages ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MDS Global Holding Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by MDS Global Holding Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by MDS Global Holding Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named BEVYZ
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2019 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 7, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2015 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 10, 2015 | XXXX | POST REGISTRATION ACTION CORRECTION | — |
| Apr 10, 2015 | 8.PR | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 10, 2015 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Apr 10, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 6, 2015 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 16, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2013 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 5, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 15, 2013 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2013 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 22, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 2, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 21, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 18, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 26, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 14, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 6, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |