Drawing for UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY RESEARCH AND EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION

USPTO serial 77108231

UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY RESEARCH AND EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LORENZO, KATHLEEN H
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY RESEARCH AND EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sanford Astor

SANFORD ASTOR LEWIS, BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH, LLP221 N FIGUEROA ST STE 1200LOS ANGELES, CA 90012-2663UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
044Foundation services, namely promoting research and training and public education relevant to cerebral palsy and other developmental disabilitiesACTIVEDec 31, 1955

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 22, 2008MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jul 22, 2008ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jul 21, 2008EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jan 14, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 14, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 14, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 10, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 10, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 10, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 11, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 4, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 21, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance