Drawing for FEIN. SPECIALIST FOR DURABLE POWER TOOLS

USPTO serial 77108535

FEIN. SPECIALIST FOR DURABLE POWER TOOLS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DOMBROW, COLLEEN M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FEIN. SPECIALIST FOR DURABLE POWER TOOLS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Wesley W. Whitmyer, Jr.

WESLEY W. WHITMYER, JR. ST. ONGE STEWARD JOHNSTON & REENS LLC986 BEDFORD STREETSTAMFORD, CT 06905-5619UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007ELECTRIC HAND-HELD POWER TOOLS, NAMELY DRILLING MACHINES, CORE DRILLING MACHINES FOR METAL, SCREWDRIVERS, ANGLE GRINDERS, STRAIGHT GRINDERS, ECCENTRIC SANDERS, ROTARY SANDERS, ORBITAL SANDERS, BELT SANDERS, HALF-SHEET FINISHING SANDERS, TAPPERS, SHEET METAL SHEARS, NIBBLERS, JIG SAWS, CIRCULAR SAWS, OSCILLATING TRIANGLE SANDERS, OSCILLATING CUTTING MACHINES, ROUTERS; SPARE REPLACEMENT PARTS FOR AFORE-MENTIONED POWER TOOLS SOLD TOGETHER WITH THE TOOLS AS A UNIT; ACCESSORIES FOR OSCILLATING TOOLS, NAMELY SANDING PLATES IN THE NATURE OF ABRASIVE DISKS FOR POWER SANDERS, GRINDING DISKS, SAW-BLADES, CUTTING BLADES AND SCRAPING BLADES FOR POWER TOOLS; MOUNT-ON ELECTRIC MOTORS FOR POWER TOOLS; DUST EXTRACTORS; POWER SCREWDRIVER-DRILL COMBINATIONS IN THE NATURE OF CORDLESS DRILL-DRIVERS AND CORDLESS IMPACT-DRIVERS; HAMMER DRILLS, NAMELY, ROTARY POWER DRILLS FEATURING HAMMERING ACTION; CIRCULAR SAWS, JIG SAWS, SABRE SAWS, IMPACT WRENCHES, DIE GRINDERS, POWER-OPERATED ANGLE POLISHERS, MAGNETIC DRILL STANDS, NAMELY, POWER DRILLS FEATURING MAGNETIC PLATES TO SECURE THEM TO METAL SURFACES IN AN UPRIGHT POSITIONACTIVE—
009BATTERIES AND BATTERY CHARGERSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 27, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 27, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 23, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 23, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 23, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 24, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 1, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 12, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 26, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 26, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 29, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 28, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 28, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 28, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2007GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 19, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 19, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 28, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 27, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 27, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 8, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 4, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 21, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance