Drawing for STAYING IN THE GAME

USPTO serial 77108601

STAYING IN THE GAME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SALEM-HOWEY, AISHA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STAYING IN THE GAME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SUSAN REISS

SUSAN REISS SHEARMAN & STERLING LLP599 LEXINGTON AVENUEINTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DOCKETINGNEW YORK, NY 10022

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Books in the field of self-helpACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 8, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 8, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 21, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 21, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 10, 2008TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Nov 10, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 10, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 6, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 6, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 25, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 25, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 6, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 14, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 25, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 12, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 12, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 8, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 7, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 7, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 5, 2007GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 5, 2007CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 4, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 21, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance