USPTO serial 77108736
INUTECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3454697Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 24, 2008
- Examiner
- WELLS, KELLEY L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with INUTECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Eg Chix Advanced Technologies, S.A.S.
Landivisiau Cedex, FR
Other trademarks owned by Eg Chix Advanced Technologies, S.A.S.
Eg Chix Advanced Technologies, S.A.S.
Landivisiau Cedex, FR
Other trademarks owned by Eg Chix Advanced Technologies, S.A.S.
Eg Chix Advanced Technologies, S.A.S.
Landivisiau Cedex, FR
Other trademarks owned by Eg Chix Advanced Technologies, S.A.S.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas A. O'Rourke
Thomas A. O'Rourke BODNER & O'ROURKE, LLP425 BROADHOLLOW RD STE. 120MELVILLE, NY 11747-4701UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Automatic hatchery systems for chicks and eggs comprised primarily of conveyors, chick and egg washers, devices for determining the sex of chicks and eggs, automatic vaccination apparatus and needle-based and needle-free injection systems for injecting chicks and eggs | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 1, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Eg Chix Advanced Technologies, S.A.S.
- Other trademarks owned by Eg Chix Advanced Technologies, S.A.S.
- Other trademarks owned by Eg Chix Advanced Technologies, S.A.S.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named INUTECH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 10, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 19, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 19, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 16, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 6, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 6, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 3, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 14, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 25, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 5, 2007 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 5, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 14, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 8, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 4, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |