Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 77108873?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/77108873. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns TRUE SOULMATE?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 77108873, the listed owner(s) include: Jose Quant.

What is USPTO serial number 77108873?

Serial number 77108873 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark TRUE SOULMATE. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

Which trademark classes cover TRUE SOULMATE?

The public record lists International Classes: 018, 025. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 77108873

TRUE SOULMATE

Q: What is the current status of TRUE SOULMATE?

TRUE SOULMATE (77108873) currently shows USPTO status code 603 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603

Filing date: Feb 15, 2007
Status date: May 15, 2009
Registration date: —
Examiner: KLINE, MATTHEW
Law office: TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRUE SOULMATE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Jose Quant
Rancho Dominguez, CA
Other trademarks owned by Jose Quant

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan Natland, Esq.

SUSAN NATLAND, ESQ. KNOBBE MARTENS OLSON & BEAR, LLP2040 MAIN ST FL 14IRVINE, CA 92614-7216UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
018	Attaché cases, garment bags for travel, beach bags, briefcases, canes, all-purpose sport bags, duffel bags, backpacks, handbags, key cases, wallets, purses, tote bags, athletic bags, book bags, gym bags, overnight bags, fanny packs, rucksacks, cosmetic bags sold empty, toiletry cases sold empty, credit card cases, calling card cases, suitcases, traveling bags, trunks for traveling, umbrellas, valises, and shopping bags of textile, leather and mesh	ACTIVE	—
025	Clothing, namely, shirts, tops, tank tops, jerseys, t-shirts, blouses, sweat shirts, sweaters, ponchos, shawls, scarves, dresses, skirts, bottoms, shorts, overalls, jeans, pants, sweat pants, coats, jackets, rainwear, belts, socks, swimwear, robes, gloves, mittens, sleepwear and undergarments; headwear and footwear	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
May 15, 2009	MAB3	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
May 15, 2009	ABN3	ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
May 15, 2009	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
May 12, 2009	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Mar 30, 2009	EXFB	EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF	—
Jan 9, 2009	GEA1	NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED	—
Jan 9, 2009	GECD	ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED	—
Jan 9, 2009	CNCF	ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED	—
Jan 5, 2009	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Jan 5, 2009	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jan 5, 2009	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Dec 17, 2008	ERFR	TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED	—
Dec 17, 2008	EXPI	EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED	—
Dec 17, 2008	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Dec 17, 2008	EXAF	EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB	—
Jun 27, 2008	GNFN	NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED	—
Jun 27, 2008	GNFR	FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 27, 2008	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 5, 2008	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Jun 5, 2008	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jun 5, 2008	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 5, 2007	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2007	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2007	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 10, 2007	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Nov 9, 2007	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Nov 9, 2007	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 9, 2007	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 2007	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 2007	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Feb 22, 2007	MPMK	NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED	—
Feb 21, 2007	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—