Drawing for ORGANIC HARVEST FEEDS

USPTO serial 77109062

ORGANIC HARVEST FEEDS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARLSEN, EMILY K
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ORGANIC HARVEST FEEDS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey S. Standley

Jeffrey S. Standley Standley Law Group LLP6300 Riverside DriveDublin, OH 43017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031Mixed animal feedACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 10, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 10, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 10, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 19, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2008EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jun 19, 2008GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 19, 2008GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 19, 2008CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Apr 28, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 28, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 28, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 15, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 2, 2007GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Oct 2, 2007GNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED—
Oct 2, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Sep 8, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 7, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 7, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 28, 2007GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 28, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 28, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 7, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 7, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 7, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 7, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 7, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 31, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 21, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance